Defining and benchmarking open problems in single-cell analysis

benchmarking
scrna-seq
website
Authors

Malte D. Luecken

Scott Gigante

Daniel B. Burkhardt

Robrecht Cannoodt

Daniel C. Strobl

Nikolay S. Markov

Luke Zappia

Giovanni Palla

Wesley Lewis

Daniel Dimitrov

Michael E. Vinyard

D.S. Magruder

Michaela F. Mueller

Alma Andersson

Emma Dann

Qian Qin

Dominik J. Otto

Michal Klein

Olga Borisovna Botvinnik

Louise Deconinck

Kai Waldrant

Sai Nirmayi Yasa

Artur Szałata

Andrew Benz

Zhijian Li

Open Problems Jamboree Members

Jonathan M. Bloom

Angela Oliveira Pisco

Julio Saez-Rodriguez

Drausin Wulsin

Luca Pinello

Yvan Saeys

Fabian J Theis

Smita Krishnaswamy

Date

July 1, 2025

Links
Citation stats
publications
0
supporting
0
mentioning
0
contrasting
0
Smart Citations
0
0
0
0
Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

Abstract

Single-cell genomics has enabled the study of biological processes at an unprecedented scale and resolution. These studies were enabled by innovative data generation technologies coupled with emerging computational tools specialized for single-cell data. As single-cell technologies have become more prevalent, so has the development of new analysis tools, which has resulted in over 1,700 published algorithms (as of February 2024). Thus, there is an increasing need to continually evaluate which algorithm performs best in which context to inform best practices that evolve with the field.

In many fields of quantitative science, public competitions and benchmarks address this need by evaluating state-of-the-art methods against known criteria, following the concept of a common task framework. Here, we present Open Problems, a living, extensive, community-guided platform including 12 current single-cell tasks that we envisage raising standards for the selection, evaluation and development of methods in single-cell analysis.

Citation

BibTeX citation:
@article{d._luecken2025,
  author = {D. Luecken, Malte and Gigante, Scott and B. Burkhardt,
    Daniel and Cannoodt, Robrecht and C. Strobl, Daniel and S. Markov,
    Nikolay and Zappia, Luke and Palla, Giovanni and Lewis, Wesley and
    Dimitrov, Daniel and E. Vinyard, Michael and Magruder, D.S. and F.
    Mueller, Michaela and Andersson, Alma and Dann, Emma and Qin, Qian
    and J. Otto, Dominik and Klein, Michal and Borisovna Botvinnik, Olga
    and Deconinck, Louise and Waldrant, Kai and Nirmayi Yasa, Sai and
    Szałata, Artur and Benz, Andrew and Li, Zhijian and Problems
    Jamboree Members, Open and M. Bloom, Jonathan and Oliveira Pisco,
    Angela and Saez-Rodriguez, Julio and Wulsin, Drausin and Pinello,
    Luca and Saeys, Yvan and J Theis, Fabian and Krishnaswamy, Smita},
  title = {Defining and Benchmarking Open Problems in Single-Cell
    Analysis},
  journal = {Nature biotechnology},
  volume = {43},
  number = {7},
  pages = {1035-1040},
  date = {2025-07-01},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02694-w},
  doi = {10.1038/s41587-025-02694-w},
  issn = {1087-0156},
  langid = {en},
  abstract = {Single-cell genomics has enabled the study of biological
    processes at an unprecedented scale and resolution. These studies
    were enabled by innovative data generation technologies coupled with
    emerging computational tools specialized for single-cell data. As
    single-cell technologies have become more prevalent, so has the
    development of new analysis tools, which has resulted in over 1,700
    published algorithms (as of February 2024). Thus, there is an
    increasing need to continually evaluate which algorithm performs
    best in which context to inform best practices that evolve with the
    field. In many fields of quantitative science, public competitions
    and benchmarks address this need by evaluating state-of-the-art
    methods against known criteria, following the concept of a common
    task framework. Here, we present Open Problems, a living, extensive,
    community-guided platform including 12 current single-cell tasks
    that we envisage raising standards for the selection, evaluation and
    development of methods in single-cell analysis.}
}
For attribution, please cite this work as:
D. Luecken, M., Gigante, S., B. Burkhardt, D., Cannoodt, R., C. Strobl, D., S. Markov, N., Zappia, L., Palla, G., Lewis, W., Dimitrov, D., E. Vinyard, M., Magruder, D. S., F. Mueller, M., Andersson, A., Dann, E., Qin, Q., J. Otto, D., Klein, M., Borisovna Botvinnik, O., Deconinck, L., Waldrant, K., Nirmayi Yasa, S., Szałata, A., Benz, A., Li, Z., Problems Jamboree Members, O., M. Bloom, J., Oliveira Pisco, A., Saez-Rodriguez, J., Wulsin, D., Pinello, L., Saeys, Y., J Theis, F. & Krishnaswamy, S. Defining and benchmarking open problems in single-cell analysis. Nature biotechnology 43, 1035–1040 (2025).